Elżbieta
Kal
The Master
and the students
It
seems that Mieczyslaw Knut In his
„minimalist” paintings attempts to unite contradictive
qualities. On one hand he maximally reduces the expressive means to
expose the immanent, constitutive painting features free form all
outside content, deprived of mimetic function, not commenting on the
reality outside it and non-representative. The essence of this
painting is its two-dimensional surface of neutral grey or beige that
does not provoke any emotions or associations. The visual message
aims at maximum objectivity to the exclusion of personal or
psychological influences. The reduction of depicted forms leaves just
the changes of texture – monotonous horizontal or vertical
growth of paintings’ surface. That allows for the exclusion of
time from the perception process and the repetitive structure enables
simultaneous perception of the whole painting, immediate
concentration on the visual essence. There are obvious associations
with Strzemiński’s theory of unism and the monochromatic
paintings of Barnett Newman, Ad Reinhardt or earlier works of Stefan
Gierowski demonstrating the surface and nature of red, green and
black colours. Yet the frame is an important division in Knut’s
paintings and together with the white margin surrounding dense colour
and texture determines ambiguous message. The uneven width of that
border or its absence from one side may suggest the endlessness of
painted and framed surface and may proof the potentiality of its
visible fragment. The light roundness of usually upper lines
delimiting painted surface may confirm the voluntary artistic choice
of cadres or a chance to multiply it ad infinitum or it may deny the
possibility. For the degree of that line’s change differs from
painting to painting so it could be either the result of impersonal
accidental character or a proof of the author’s intentional
intervention. In that sense the painting may be distinctive –
by the arbitrary choice of just a part of bigger entity. Minimal yet
visible changes in texture density – like in Painting 22
delicate horizontal strokes – and colour nuances are also
ambiguous in their apparent subjective tone because they also
generalise touching the essence of painting activity, the matter and
colour. The statement may be proved by two-layered compositions where
texture surface does not cover the colour precisely leaving a smooth
margin of different colour and texture /for instance Painting 14/. It
shows usually not visible relation between the components, unveils
structure and mutual dependence of visual elements. It is rather not
a coincidence that Jackiewicz Studio is the beginning of the artistic
journey of yet another painter faithful to contemplative and
analytical attitude.